About Me

Name:Aaron F Park
Location: Roseville, CA
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Placer County Blogs

What does Jennifer Montgomery's Latest Filing Tell Us?

I had a look at Montgomery’s campaign filing from the 6/30 cutoff and a few more names popped out…

George Beland – Former D-3 Supervisor

Jan Christofferson – Former County Executive Officer that was replaced by current CEO Tom Miller

Terry Davis – Staff Conservation Coordinator for the Sierra Club Mother Load Chapter (notice Montgomery listed him as a self-employed landscaper) http://motherlode.sierraclub.org/committee.html

Blogger’s note: I sure got a kick out of Terry Davis being listed as a self-employed landscaper. I need to fix my front and back yards. I should ask him for a bid.

Steve Kastan – Former D-5 Supervisor Rex Bloomfield’s Field Representative for the Tahoe area

Dave Mackenroth – Former Candidate for D-3 Supervisor

Don Malberg ( I think he’s the husband of Patricia Malberg who ran against Congressman Doolittle in the early 90’s)

Alex Mourelatos – Owner of property in the Tahoe area who wants to develop a housing project in Tahoe Vista

JoAnne Neft – Former Manager – Placer County Agricultural Marketing Program.

Blogger’s Note: JoAnne Neft is part of the group trying to oust Republicans from local office. Neft is a life-long Republican who will be the subject of an entire post later

Bill Newsom – Father of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom

Placer Public Employees PAC ($7,000)

GD (Dean) Prigmore – Former Deputy Planning Director under Fred Yeager

Take Back Red CA – http://www.takebackredcalifornia.org ( Take Back Red California (TBRC) is a grassroots coalition that connects northern California Democrats in urban counties with northern California Democratic activists working in rural counties especially on a local level.)

VOICE – A Homosexual advocacy group with a PAC out of San Francisco.

John Foster – North Lake Tahoe Democratic Club

Tina Thomas – She is a CEQA attorney long known for her contract relation with Angelo Tskapolous. Angelo Tskapolous might as well be the executive director of the California Democrat Party.

Add in a host of Democratic clubs – and you have the unmistakable pattern of the Democrats throwing all their eggs into the Montgomery Basket. I also believe that Liberal Democrat activist Elaine Rowen is their number two priority as they try to work with RINO’s Barbara Vineyard, JoAnne Neft (there she is again) and Bill Martin to take control of Sierra College.

Please further note the money she raised from Bay Area Liberals on her previous filing as well.

One glaring omission – Pete McCloskey must have forgotten to write her another check as he did not appear on this report.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rasmussen Poll Should Give Brown Camp Heartburn

30% of Conservative Democrats Say They’ll Vote for McCain

Two years ago, Democrat Charlie Brown lost to a wounded incumbent Republican in California ’s Fourth Congressional District. Now, making another run for the seat he believes is his to lose, Brown faces tougher competition in Sen. Tom McClintock, the darling of Ronald Reagan conservatives. Brown will not be able to benefit from Republican in-fighting in 2008 like he did in 2006 as well.

The well-known and highly popular McClintock, clearly conservative, has a libertarian streak that is attractive even to some Democrats. Remember the 2003 recall race for Governor? McClintock was the candidate deemed by more than one media outlet as the most qualified to be Governor. The Los Angeles Times said “some Democrats have praised McClintock for having a firm set of convictions that he’s able to present clearly to voters.”

Articulate and steady, McClintock’s appeal across party lines is not the only reason why he will be the next Congressman to represent the sprawling Fourth Congressional District. Voter registration in the district already favors Republicans, and especially a conservative Republican. In short, McClintock is a good conservative candidate in a good conservative district.

If that wasn’t enough evidence to spell trouble for Charlie Brown, the recent Rasmussen Report should be. There are increasing concerns about Democrat nominee Barack Obama’s chances to hang on to conservative Democrats. Clearly, Obama is the most liberal candidate the Democrat Party has fielded in more than three decades. And, he is the candidate who opposed the once well-oiled Clinton machine.

Obama likely will win California although Republicans have their best chance since 1988 to put the state in the GOP column. But not all of California ’s 58 counties will support Obama. Eight of the nine counties of the Fourth CD will be won by McCain, with Sacramento a toss-up and that’s the dilemma for Charlie Brown. Unlike Democrat candidates running in the neighboring congressional districts of the 3rd and the 11th, Charlie Brown is not just swimming against the tide, but against very strong GOP presidential undercurrents.

The recent Rasmussen Report on Obama details the trouble ahead for Charlie Brown:

Thirty percent (30 percent) of conservative Democrats say they’re voting for John McCain. Data from Rasmussen Reports also shows McCain picking up support from 19 percent of White Democrats and 15 percent of Democrats over the age of 50. These results are from national telephone survey interviews conducted with 14,000 Likely Voters during the two weeks ending July 24. The sample includes 5,074 Democratic voters. (Rasmussen uses robo-calls)

The data shows that 43 percent of Democrats consider themselves politically liberal, 37percent say they’re moderate, and 18 percent are conservative.

Forty-one percent (41 percent) of conservative Democrats have a favorable opinion of John McCain. Sixty-seven percent (67 percent) say the same about Obama.

Among liberal Democrats, just 23 percent have a positive opinion about McCain, but 90 percent give Obama favorable reviews.

Obama is supported by 78 percent of Democrats overall, a figure that includes 62 percent of conservative Democrats. He leads 84 percent to 13 percent among Democrats under 30. But, among those over 65, Obama earns just 74 percent of the vote while McCain is preferred by 16 percent of Democratic senior citizens. It is interesting to note that just 2 percent of Democrats under 30 hold back from selecting either Obama or McCain. That number grows to 9 percent among Democrats over 65.

This means that despite the certain coronation of Barak Obama, Charlie Brown is in trouble. Charlie Brown can’t run the same campaign this time around, and he is already trying to hide his liberal philosophy (see also his energy ‘plan’). In the end, Charlie Brown will go home defeated, a victim of his own party’s liberalism.

Sorry Charlie! These are national numbers, and they are going to be way worse here in the 4th CD.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Endorsements Announced by the Placer County Republican Party for the November 4th General Election

The Party will oppose local tax increases, bonds, & spending measures

Roseville CA August 1, 2008—-The Placer County Republican Party Central Committee voted to OPPOSE these local ballot measures:

Measure M Los Rios Community College District Bond
Measure N Center Unified School District Bond
Measure P Placer Hills Fire District Gann Limit Waiver
Measure Q Colfax Elementary School District Bond
Measure R Placer County Board of Supervisors Pay Increase
Measure S County Counsel Elimination of At Will Employment
Measure T Alta Dutch Flat Parcel Tax
Measure U Tahoe Truckee Unified School District Bond

The Central Committee also made endorsements for the statewide ballot measures that will appear on the general election ballot:

Proposition 1 – NO High-Speed Rail Bond
Proposition 2 – NO Farm Animal Treatment Mandates
Proposition 3 – NO Children’s Hospital Bond
Proposition 4 – YES Child & Teen Safety and Stop Predators Act (Sarah’s Law)
Proposition 5 – NO Drug Offender Early Release
Proposition 6 – NO Safe Neighborhoods Act
Proposition 7 – NO Alternative Energy Mandates
Proposition 8 – YES Protect Marriage
Proposition 9 – YES Crime Victims’ Bill of Rights
Proposition 10 – NO Alternative Energy Bond
Proposition 11 – YES Voters’ First (Independent Redistricting Commission)
Proposition 12 – YES Veterans Home Loan Bond (Revenue Bond)

“Polls show that the Placer County Republican Party endorsement is the most important and most persuasive endorsement a campaign can receive in Placer County,” said Tom Hudson, the Chairman of the Placer County Republican Central Committee. “Our Committee members and volunteers research the issues, attend hearings, meet with officeholders, and listen to both sides before making recommendations on ballot measures. People know that we understand the issues before we take a stand, so our endorsements are widely respected.”

“These endorsements are a public service by the Placer County Republican Party,” said Jerry Simmons, the Endorsements Committee Chairman. “Unlike slate cards and political action committees that sell their endorsements to the highest bidder, the Party endorsements are based on Republican principles, not petty politics. We have not received any funding from these campaigns.”

With these endorsements, the Placer County Republican Party intends to send the clear message to our hard-working local elected officials that we expect local governments to live within their means after several years of record-breaking budget increases at the local level. The last thing we need now are tax increases, whether in the form of parcel taxes, bonds, or exemptions from the Gann Limit,” said Hudson.

"We respect our county supervisors, but we fear that the 60% pay increase they have proposed for themselves will attract the wrong sort of candidates for that position.  We want part-time public servants and community activists on the Board of Supervisors, not career politicians in search of a full-time pay-check for part-time work.  Supervisor Bruce Kranz did the right thing by opposing this salary increase."

(Blogger's Note - Kirk Uhler vociferously opposed measure "R". The tapes of the BOS meeting will show as such, he and Bruce were the 2 vote minority opposed to Measure "R")

The Placer County Republican Party works aggressively to assist all of the campaigns of the ballot measures and candidates that it has endorsed, with direct mail, telephone calls, and precinct walks to Republican households. Over the past decade, Placer County voters have agreed with Placer County Republican Party endorsements more than 85% of the time.

Additional Contacts for this story:
Jerry Simmons, Endorsements Committee Chairman:
Tom Hudson, Placer County Republican Party Chairman:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Charlie Brown Loses More Ammo - Ventura RINO's show true stripes

A group of Liberal Republicans attacked Tom McClintock during the primary. Now, they are out in support of Democrat Hanna-Beth Jackson for State Senate.

This would be back in McClintock's soon-to-be-old district.

This certainly makes the case for what the CRA says about RINO's.

Especially when a lefty blog like calitics lauds their effort...

Does anyone think that this group of "Republicans" will carry any weight with their opinion?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Save Sierra College (From What!?) Press Release Announces Support of Democrat Activist

Yup - their leader voted against a balanced budget resolution as well.

Led by former Grand Jury Member Bill Martin – the Save Sierra College (from What!?) group has announced that Sierra College is still reeling from wounds inflicted by the termination of Kevin Ramirez.

They cite a campaign against Liberal Supervisor Robert Weygant as another such wound.

Please tell me that Save Sierra College (from what!?) is about more than revenge…

Read it and weep...



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Campaign is Afoot - Pencilnecks are Whining About 4X6 McClintock Signs

(Blogger’s Note – Placer GOP Chairman Tom Hudson has a rancheria – that may soon be designated as English Indian land – on Baseline Road, one of the busiest arteries in Placer County… the Gov’t Bureaucrat Brownies must not like the sign very much…)

Dear (List of people deleted),

My wife got a call from Scott Sparks with Placer County Code Enforcement who said that my 4×6 McClintock for Congress sign violates some county ordinance. I believe he was referring to Section 17.54.190 (“Off-premises signs”), but I need to call him back to confirm the problem. If you are interested, you can check the county codes at http://qcode.us/codes/placercounty/ You’ll notice that there are different rules for different types of signs, which is precisely the sort of content-based speech discrimination that the U.S. Supreme Court has so often overturned (e.g., they can ban all signs, but they cannot ban “Election Campaign Signs” while allowing “Agricultural Sales Signs”).

The Code Enforcement Nazi said that someone had complained about my sign, saying that it should have been removed “after” the election (which has not occurred yet).

Since my sign is on one of the busiest roads in the entire county (Base Line Road, which connects Roseville and Rocklin to Highway 99), with more than 9,000 cars passing the sign each day, I suspect that the Charlie Brown folks would love to have this sign taken down. The sign sits on my own private property, so I do not plan to oblige them by taking it down, at least not until John McCain repeals the rest of the First Amendment (not to mention Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution).

Please let me know if you have heard about similar demands about other signs in the county. If there is a coordinated effort to force property owners to take down McClintock signs, this might be a good campaign issue. And it might be worth a lawsuit by me or some third party to enforce the U.S. Constitution that Charlie Brown swore to uphold and defend… Given the minimum penalties in state law for civil rights violations, this could be an expensive lawsuit for the county to lose.

Tom Hudson, Chairman
Placer County Republican Party
Work: (916) 445-3986
Home: (916) 991-9400
Cell: (916) 833-8948
Fax: (916) 991-9300

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vapid and Absurd Attacks Continue From Charlie Brown's Campaign

Sorry Charlie!

In a clear sign that the Brown Campaign is trying desperately to make noise… they have been on an obsessive tirade over the exploratory committees from 2006 that McClintock still has open.

Basically, they have switched from regular strength Kool-Aid to the Kevorkian department: According to reliable sources, the Charlie Brown congressional campaign is pitching reporters on a bogus story that Tom McClintock is not really interested in Congress but looking to run for the Board of Equalization in 2010.

The evidence? McClintock has an old campaign account from last year still open! EE-gads! If this is the best that ex-pilot Charlie Brown has to offer, he’d better radio for a clean-up crew and some runway foam. Someone needs to call Lungren, Andal and Issa and tell them to close their state accounts while they are at it.

First, rumors last year had a termed-out Senator McClintock looking at a BOE seat…(Y-A-W-N). In March, however, after John Doolittle announced he was retiring from Congress, McClintock jumped into one of the most expensive GOP primary battles ever against a well-funded former Congressman. McClintock raised more than $1.5 million against his opponent’s $6.2 million and still won by 15 points. You’d have to be insane or narcissistic to the point of a padded cell with finger-paints to walk into a $6.2 million meat grinder + the entire establishment minus a few brave souls endorsing the Millionaire Liberal.

Second, I confirmed that since McClintock announced his intentions for Congress, his campaign has returned all contributions made to the BOE account. That’s $7,700 of checks returned. If a contribution goes to an office location, it gets returned. However, contributions mailed directly to the bank get processed automatically. It takes a little longer, but all of the contributions after March 4th will end up returned.

Third, McClintock can’t use more than $1,000 of his state campaign funds to run for Congress, the maximum amount allowed by law.

Fourth, many candidates keep campaign accounts active, primarily to assist other candidates seeking state office. Former Republican Leader Jim Brulte has more than a million dollars in a campaign account, rolling it over every election cycle.

Democrats have played up Charlie Brown’s ability to talk issues. Now, this is the best the guy can do?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Team Montgomery Update: Bruce Kranz is an Ogre!?

Last week, it was a letter to the editor written by a White Male Communist complaining that White Male Republicans run Placer County.

This week, it is a blog – Called Sundahai39 on Politics:

Their Opinions are so well thought out, I decided I’d share them with you:

Defeating Placer County Supervisor Bruce Kranz, Aaron Klein and Scott Leslie and Tom McClintock Will Liberate Occupied Placer County

Freedom from neo-conservatism and international corporate tyranny is now possible if we act decisively. We must look at reality straight on: Republicans are pressuring Governor Schwarznegger to roll back emission laws; McCain pledges to continue Bush’s scorched earth environmental policies and his march toward American Empire. They together have temporarily divided the US from the world.

Continue Reading

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jennifer Montgomery (in her own words) using the Death of Soldiers as a Political Prop

12/23/2004 Letter

(Notice how the Yellow Elephants are back…)

Are you happy?

So far 19 dead in this week’s attack on the mess tent in Iraq. What a terrific Christmas present for their families. And what does our President have to say about this? According to the Associated Press, “President Bush said the explosion should not derail the elections and that he hoped relatives of those killed know that their loved ones died in ‘a vital mission for peace.’”

There is now an opening for any Truckee Bush voters in Iraq – 19 openings to be specific (actually 1,325 since the start of the war). Or better yet, I nominate the Bush twins to go serve in Bush’s “vital mission for peace.”

You got what you voted for. Are you happy?

Jennifer Montgomery

Soda Springs

So, here you have it – Jennifer Montgomery celebrating the death of Soldiers to make political points.

In addition, she shows a lack of creativity, trotting out the Nancy Pelosi Yellow-Elepahnt argument. (You can’t support the war unless your son is serving, you have served or are serving, etc…)

Next, she uses their death as a entree into explaining why people should vote Democrat instead. That is sick and extreme…

Now, she is running for Supervisor – for what reason? When you read the above, you have to wonder what her purpose for becoming a supervisor will be.

So much for the concept of “Non-Partisan Office”...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Charlie Brown releases first lie of 2008 Election Cycle - My Letter to the Editor in Response

File this one under --- you have got to be kidding me.

Tom McClintock is to blame for high gas prices, that's what Charlie Brown says.

I decided to set Brown on fire in the local media - Check it Out...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Brown's Campaign Dealt a Death Blow by the AP - Article says we are winning the war

What a day!

Charlie Brown is now in a vice-grip. He has been outed as a liberal and now he is going to have to defend his stances on Iraq as well!

A few days ago, he came out with a Drilling Plan I just blogged about, but as I was getting ready to shut my computer down... a story hit the AP wire about the USA actually winning the war in Iraq!!!

Read the whole thing here

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Charlie Brown Update - Calitics knows Brown is no Moderate

Maybe we could liken the Brownies to a group of Sgt. Schultz’s “Ve know nuting”.

Maybe there is a reason why the Brownies are reticent to go on the record on any issue:

Calitics, a renowned Lefty Blog… basically the Daily Joke (Kos) of CA… had a few things to say about the Brown energy plan release:

(The context of the post is that it is a list of Democrat targeted house races for 2008. McClintock after getting hammered by 6.2 million of Ose’s assassinations is apparently in for some more smearing before he gets to D.C.)

Continue Reading

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Envrios Dancing over potential denial of Water and Flood Protection to Sacramento Area...

“Auburn Dam is DEAD,” said Jennings. “The autopsy, obituary and eulogy have been written.”

It is telling when people celebrate against good planning. It is well known that Sacramento is going to run out of water for development.

So what, say the enviros… make ‘em go somewhere else. (Maybe the Sierra Club forgot that a founding principle of America is freedom of movement)

Jerry Brown deep-sixed freeway construction in the 1970’s and now our evil SUV’s are belching out pollution because they are idling on roads built when the world’s population was 1/2 what it is now. Don’t give me the crap about Priuses – the forests are being strip-mined for the minerals to make their batteries. Poor people in Africa are being subjected to slave labor for minerals used in a ton of the components that go into “GREEN” electronic products.

Continue Reading
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jennifer Bloomfield-Montgomery's Vision for Placer County (In Her Own Words)

Rumor has it there are people in office looking forward to Bruce Kranz’ ouster.

I am wondering if they have thoroughly vetted the person they are supporting actively or by ommission.

Jennifer Bloomfield-Montgomery is a prolific writer.

Have a look at Jennifer Montgomery Introducing herself to the Sierra Sun almost 4 years ago (8/25/2004):

The entire article is linked here.

An exceprt is provided here for your consumption -

“The second woman was also raised in Palo Alto, but in a very socially progressive family. Her mom and dad were both actively involved the civil rights and anti-war movements. They were both staunch environmentalists. Her father did pro bono work for those accused on minor drug possession charges. When no local court reporters could be found, her mother traveled to Mississippi to take the depositions of people involved in civil rights trials. Her first presidential vote was for a Democrat. After college she traveled and lived in Europe and came back to the U.S. with a new perspective on how the U.S. was viewed in the world. She became active in women’s rights issues, environmental issues and is currently working to get John Kerry elected.

Which of these women has the right to the label “patriot”? Both of them; they are the same woman: Me.

Montgomery does not stop with the expose’ on her background – she decided to make the following additional statement near the end of her letter -

I am now not a member of any political party. I have an American flag decal and a John Kerry bumper sticker on my car. I am a patriot and I question the policies of George Bush and his Cabinet. I support our troops and I believe this new Iraq War to be predicated on fabrications. I love my country and I doubt that our current government represents the best interests of the United States.

Jennifer Montgomery is a political activist and is not fit for office. It seems that her base of support are the Sierra Club and affiliated types looking for an activist presence on the Board of Supervisors.

Those eagerly awaiting the ouster of Bruce Kranz weather for their own purposes of revenge or seeking power had best take pause.

The comment about not being a member of any political party is disengenuous at best. Montgomery has been a staunch supporter of everything liberal (Charlie Brown, Eco-Groups etc.) since anyone knew anything about her.

In the last 4 years, Montgomery has had a lot to say about many things. Stay tuned.

Blogger’s Note – this Letter to the editor was posted in its’ entirety before the Primary but merits being brought up again as this is the first notation of Montgomery in the local media we could locate.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WWCBD? Tom McClintock Speaks Forcefully for Placer County at State Water Resources Board

Blogger’s Notes – What Would Charlie Brown Do? Would Charlie have the courage to speak up for flood protection, water storage and hydro-electric production? After all, Hydro is about the greenest energy out there and flood protection is a primary responsibility of Government (like preventing wildfires) – as in protecting the citizens.

WWCBD
? Side with the Enviros or with the People of Sacramento who need flood protection? Does Charlie Brown understand the conditions of the levees around Sacramento? They have all been downgraded recently and thousands of homeowners find themselves suddenly having to purchase flood insurance.

State Sen. Tom McClintock appeared Monday before the State Water Resources Control Board which may revoke the permits that are necessary for proceeding with construction of the Auburn Dam.

Below are Sen. McClintock’s remarks before the State Water Control Board in support of the Auburn Dam.

Sen. Tom McClintock’s Statement to State Water Resources Control Board
Sacramento, California
July 21, 2008

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board:

Your board meets today to consider revoking permits that are necessary for proceeding with construction of the Auburn Dam. I’m sure there’ll be a detailed legal discussion on both sides involving exactly what constitutes due diligence in overcoming the endless legal obstacles that have delayed this project since it was first authorized by Congress in 1965.

But all the legal arguments on both sides won’t alter what we ALL know.

This dam has been stalled for nearly 40 years by inexhaustible waves of litigation, political wrangling and changing regulations. It is not a lack of diligence that prevents completion of the Auburn Dam – it is rather an abundance of delay and dilatory tactics that your board can either cut through or add to.

And here is the fine point of it.

The practical effect of your decision will be to maintain the option of the Auburn Dam or to further delay and complicate its ultimate completion.

When history looks back on these proceedings – and it will – that is going to be the sum total of its judgment. Not fine legal points. Not technical interpretations of regulations. But the simple question: did the state act in the best interests of its posterity?

You should already have a very clear answer to that question.

The Auburn Dam means 2.3 million acre feet of water storage at a time when Californians are already facing the prospect of growing droughts.

The Auburn Dam means 600 to 800 megawatts of clean and cheap electricity – enough for nearly a million households—at a time when Californians are already paying the highest electricity prices in the United States.

The Auburn Dam means 200 to 400 -year flood protection in a region whose levees are in perilous condition.

A generation from now, all that will truly matter to posterity is whether your actions aided or delayed the delivery of this absolutely vital project – in a period when the necessity for it was already becoming stunningly obvious.

In a very real sense, your decision either will affirm or disprove the Governor’s commitment to deliver vitally needed water, energy and flood control projects for this state.

There is an old legal expression that “hard cases make bad law,” meaning that one can get lost in a thicket of legal minutia and end up reaching a ludicrous or unjust decision.

A generation from now, the residents of this valley will live in a society with abundant water, clean energy and security from floods. Or they will live in a society of water rationing, scarce and ruinously expensive electricity and constant threat from flooding. And no decision will weigh more heavily in that future than OUR generation’s commitment to complete the Auburn Dam.

Blogger’s Endnote – It looks like Tom McClintock understands and comprehends the needs of Northern California after all – while Charlie Brown talks about using government to take control of the Oil Industry.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive